Phoebe Cohen, a geosciences professor and department chair at Williams College, said “intellectual debate and rigor” are products of the white patriarchy.
Cohen was quoted by The New York Times Wednesday dismissing the idea that higher education should “serve as a bastion of unfettered speech.”
This is one of the most racist quotes I've read in awhile. https://t.co/2DR39bv4EO
— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) October 20, 2021
Her comments came in support of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s recent decision to disinvite Dorian Abbot, a star geology professor at the University of Chicago, to deliver a prestigious lecture in the fall amid outcry over his unrelated criticism of diversity programs.
- Cohen said she wanted even harsher “professional consequences” for Abbot, disagreeing with MIT’s offer to let him speak to its professors at a later date.
Robert vander Hilst, the head of MIT’s earth, atmospheric and planetary sciences department, defended canceling Abbot’s lecture as demanded by some MIT faculty, graduate students and other academics and commentators.
- “Besides freedom of speech, we have the freedom to pick the speaker who best fits our needs,” Hilst told the Times’ Michael Powell. “Words matter and have consequences.”
A handful of academics, though, spoke out in defense of Abbot’s right to speak, as did some journalists, including dissident leftist Glenn Greenwald and liberal Times opinion columnist Michelle Goldberg.
- “MIT has behaved disgracefully in capitulating to a politically motivated campaign,” said Robert George, a political philosopher at Princeton University. “This is part of a larger trend of the politicization of science.”
Abbott, who is white, has publicly “asserted that [affirmative action and diversity] programs treat ‘people as members of a group rather than as individuals, repeating the mistake that made possible the atrocities of the 20th century,'” per the Times.
- “He said that he favored a diverse pool of applicants selected on merit.”
In response to his lecture being canceled, Abbot warned, “We’re not going to do the best science we can if we are constrained ideologically.”
- “There is no question that these controversies will have a negative impact on my scientific career,” he said. “But I don’t want to live in a country where instead of discussing something difficult we go and silence debate.”
The Smithsonian’s National Museum of African American History and Culture last summer published a chart summing up the woke view that traditional American values — like hard work and rational thought — are problematic features of “White dominant culture, or whiteness.”
The National Museum of African American History & Culture wants to make you aware of certain signs of whiteness: Individualism, hard work, objectivity, the nuclear family, progress, respect for authority, delayed gratification, more. (via @RpwWilliams)https://t.co/k9X3u4Suas pic.twitter.com/gWYOeEh4vu
— Byron York (@ByronYork) July 15, 2020
The museum later removed the chart and apologized, but, as The Economist detailed last month, wokeness has continued to spread from its incubators at university humanities departments across the academy and the culture.
- The Economist defined the ideology as “a belief that any disparities between racial groups are evidence of structural racism; that the norms of free speech, individualism and universalism which pretend to be progressive are really camouflage for this discrimination; and that injustice will persist until systems of language and privilege are dismantled.”